0.05/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.11	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.11/0.31	% Computer   : n010.cluster.edu
0.11/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.11/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 12:29:51 EDT 2021
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.32	% Number of cores: 8
0.11/0.32	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.11/0.32	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.11/0.32	# No SInE strategy applied
0.11/0.32	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.56/0.86	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_RG_S04AN
0.56/0.86	# and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
0.56/0.86	#
0.56/0.86	# Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
0.56/0.86	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.56/0.86	
0.56/0.86	# Proof found!
0.56/0.86	# SZS status Theorem
0.56/0.86	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.56/0.86	thf(thm, conjecture, ?[X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X3 @ three)=(three), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm)).
0.56/0.86	thf(zero_ax, axiom, (zero)=(^[X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:X2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM006^0.ax', zero_ax)).
0.56/0.86	thf(plus_ax, axiom, (plus)=(^[X4:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:X4 @ X1 @ (X3 @ X1 @ X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM006^0.ax', plus_ax)).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X3 @ three)=(three)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X39:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X39 @ three)!=(three), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:(zero @ X1 @ X2)=(X2), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[zero_ax])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X4:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:(plus @ X4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)=(X4 @ X1 @ (X3 @ X1 @ X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[plus_ax])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X3 @ three)!=(three), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i]:(zero @ X6 @ X7)=(X7), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X31:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X32:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X33:$i > $i, X34:$i]:(plus @ X31 @ X32 @ X33 @ X34)=(X31 @ X33 @ (X32 @ X33 @ X34)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X3 @ three @ (esk1_2 @ X3))!=(three @ (esk1_2 @ X3)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:(zero @ X1 @ X2)=(X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:$i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X4:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X2:$i]:(plus @ X3 @ X4 @ X1 @ X2)=(X3 @ X1 @ (X4 @ X1 @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(plus @ X3 @ three @ (esk1_2 @ X3) @ (esk3_1 @ X3))!=(three @ (esk1_2 @ X3) @ (esk3_1 @ X3)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1:$i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X2:$i]:(plus @ zero @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)=(X3 @ X1 @ X2), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.56/0.86	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), ['proof']).
0.56/0.86	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.56/0.86	# Proof object total steps             : 16
0.56/0.86	# Proof object clause steps            : 7
0.56/0.86	# Proof object formula steps           : 9
0.56/0.86	# Proof object conjectures             : 7
0.56/0.86	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
0.56/0.86	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.56/0.86	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
0.56/0.86	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
0.56/0.86	# Proof object generating inferences   : 2
0.56/0.86	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
0.56/0.86	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.56/0.86	# Parsed axioms                        : 29
0.56/0.86	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.56/0.86	# Initial clauses                      : 29
0.56/0.86	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
0.56/0.86	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
0.56/0.86	# Processed clauses                    : 2390
0.56/0.86	# ...of these trivial                  : 233
0.56/0.86	# ...subsumed                          : 875
0.56/0.86	# ...remaining for further processing  : 1282
0.56/0.86	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 975
0.56/0.86	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.56/0.86	# Backward-subsumed                    : 8
0.56/0.86	# Backward-rewritten                   : 89
0.56/0.86	# Generated clauses                    : 41004
0.56/0.86	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 36934
0.56/0.86	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.56/0.86	# Paramodulations                      : 33056
0.56/0.86	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.56/0.86	# NegExts                              : 2292
0.56/0.86	# Equation resolutions                 : 975
0.56/0.86	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.56/0.86	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.56/0.86	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.56/0.86	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.56/0.86	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.56/0.86	# Current number of processed clauses  : 1170
0.56/0.86	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 155
0.56/0.86	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
0.56/0.86	#    Negative unit clauses             : 8
0.56/0.86	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 998
0.56/0.86	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34476
0.56/0.86	# ...number of literals in the above   : 96795
0.56/0.86	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.56/0.86	# Current number of archived clauses   : 112
0.56/0.86	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 139702
0.56/0.86	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107681
0.56/0.86	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 884
0.56/0.86	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
0.56/0.86	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.56/0.86	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 847
0.56/0.86	# BW rewrite match successes           : 72
0.56/0.86	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.56/0.86	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.56/0.86	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 448669
0.56/0.86	
0.56/0.86	# -------------------------------------------------
0.56/0.86	# User time                : 0.476 s
0.56/0.86	# System time              : 0.026 s
0.56/0.86	# Total time               : 0.502 s
0.56/0.86	# Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
0.56/0.86	EOF
